Are there any robust social/goal priming effects (which cannot be attributed to Demand or Expectancy)? Pointers appreciated!

(#1) By H. Pashler on Wed 07/04/2012 09:51 am CDT (5 years ago)[reply]
My colleagues and I have made multiple attempts at direct replication of social/goal priming effects, using blind experimenters to avoid expectancy effects. So far, we have found nothing--not even trends (see eg our two postings on PsychFileDrawer and our in-press paper on Williams and Bargh 2008). But we still haven't given up. Can anyone point us to any effect in this area that they have found to be robust and repeatable? (By "social/goal priming" I mean cases where incidental words, pictures, etc. produce changes in behavioral choices or motivations. Perceptual priming effects are very robust, of course.) If there is a social/goal priming study that is robust--ie repeatable in direct replications, not conceptual replication--we would love to hear about it so we can try it out... Thanks... -- Hal Pashler
(#2) By Concerned* on Wed 08/01/2012 06:22 pm CDT (5 years ago)[reply]
Is it just a coincidence that the recent cases of psychology researchers "outed" for fabricating their data were in the subfield of social/goal priming? There was Stapel, then Smeesters, and now Sanna. Of course, one shouldn't dismiss an entire subfield of research because of the fraudulent actions of a few. But it definitely makes me wonder whether the chase for a sexy finding is inducing some of these researchers to engage in unethical behavior. Instead of trying to one-up each other with the next big clever finding (that gets gobbled up by the news media), I hope the big names in that subfield try their best to "clean the house" by promoting full transparency in their methods/data collection. They should set a higher bar for themselves, and routinely try to replicate their own findings (direct replications, not just conceptual replications) as well as that of others in the field. I think that's the only way for the subfield to regain the confidence of their peers in other domains of psychology.
(#3) By MC* on Sun 08/05/2012 10:50 am CDT (5 years ago)[reply]
This blog has an interesting discussion ("What's up with social psychology?") about whether it is just a coincidence: http://psychologicalstatistics.blogspot.com/2012/08/whats-up-with-social-psychology.html
(#4) By cash advance online* on Wed 02/26/2014 04:56 am CST (3 years ago)[reply]
iuqspb http://paydayloansusapri.com/ cash advance online
(#5) By payday loans* on Wed 04/23/2014 06:44 pm CDT (3 years ago)[reply]
emkvkoyn http://paydayloansusaprh.com/ payday loans
(#6) By khcmdr* on Sat 05/06/2017 02:21 am CDT (7 months ago)[reply]
There are different reasons why women overlay this http://cialiswalmart.top/>price of cialis at walmart condition. There are a loads of reasons that trouble a womans libido. Increasing note at work, home, cheap, community, psychogenic pressures are some of the reasons that ignite the working order at quite an inappropriate seniority in women. Also, with aging, the desire to make tally reduces, http://www.cialiswalmart.top/ - cialis over the counter at walmart that reason supreme to need of libido and impotence to reach to the climax.
Please enter a screen name:
Post:
Security code