Menstrual cycle effect on outgroup male bias (#201)

Return to View Chart

How to Cite this Report

APA Style

Joseph Cesario. Menstrual cycle effect on outgroup male bias. (2014, September 25). Retrieved 23:53, January 17, 2018 from

MLA Style

"Menstrual cycle effect on outgroup male bias" Joseph Cesario. 25 Sep 2014 05:26 17 Jan 2018, 23:53 <>

MHRA Style

'Menstrual cycle effect on outgroup male bias', Joseph Cesario, , 25 September 2014 05:26 <> [accessed 17 January 2018]

Chicago Style

"Menstrual cycle effect on outgroup male bias", Joseph Cesario, , (accessed January 17, 2018)


Menstrual cycle effect on outgroup male bias [Internet]. Joseph Cesario; 2014 Sep 25, 05:26 [cited 2018 Jan 17]. Available from:

Reference to Original Report of Finding McDonald, M. M., Asher, B. D., Kerr, N. L., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Fertility and intergroup bias in racial and minimal-group contexts: Evidence for shared architecture. Psychological Science, 22(7), 860–5. doi:10.1177/0956797611410985
Title Menstrual cycle effect on outgroup male bias
If the original article contained multiple experiments, which one did you attempt to replicate? e.g., you might respond 'Study 1' or 'Experiment 4'. Study 1
Link to PDF of Original ReportView Article
Brief Statement of Original Result As conception risk increased, women showed greater outgroup male bias (black/white evaluative IAT) when they associated outgroup males with physicality (black/white stereotype IAT): Interaction between conception risk and stereotype IAT.
Type of Replication Attempted Fairly Direct Replication
Result Type Successful Replication
Difference? Not Applicable
Number of Subjects 111
Number of Subjects in Original Study 252
Year in which Replication Attempt was Made 2012
Name of Investigators (Real Names Required) Joseph Cesario
Detailed Description of Method/Results Data were collected by including relevant measures (stereotype IAT, evaluative IAT, conception risk) in a battery of measures across two studies, both designed to test hypotheses other than those reported here.

Participants completed stereotype IAT (black/white physical/mental), evaluative IAT (black/white bad/good), and conception risk measure. All measures were exact from original McDonald et al. 2011.

Exclusionary criteria for conception risk were identical to the original McDonald et al. 2011.

McDonald et al. 2011: B = .179, SE = .055, t = 3.26
Current Replication: B = .184, SE = .106, t = 1.74

Figure plots interaction effect on evaluative IAT, with conception risk plotted on x-axis. Solid line is -1SD on stereotype IAT, dashed line is +1SD on stereotype IAT.

All data are available for download in the "unpublished datasets" section at:
Any Known Methodological Differences
(between original and present study)?
Subjects completed the study either alone or in groups of up to six.
Email of Investigator
Name of individuals who
actually carried out the project
Various undergraduate RAs collected data, McDonald computed conception risk, Cesario analyzed data and posted here.
Location of Project67 Psychology Building, Michigan State University
Characteristics of Subjects
(subject pool, paid, etc.)
University students from subject pool
Where did these subjects reside?United States
Was this a Class Project?No
Further Details of Results as pdf
Additional Comments
Email of Original Investigator
Quantitive Information
I have complied with ethical standards for experimentation on human beings and, if necessary, have obtained appropriate permission from an Institutional Review Board or other oversight group.
TAG: Attention TAG: JDM TAG: Language TAG: Learning TAG: Memory TAG: Perception TAG: Performance TAG: Problem Solving TAG: Social Cognition TAG: Social Psychology TAG: Thinking

Are you posting an unpublished replication attempt that you conducted yourself, or noting a published replication attempt?

Post Unpublished
Post Published