Failure to replicate "are numbers gendered?" (#206)

Return to View Chart

How to Cite this Report

APA Style

Bogdan Kostic and Cory Derringer. Failure to replicate "are numbers gendered?". (2014, December 01). Retrieved 22:27, November 17, 2017 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjA2

MLA Style

"Failure to replicate "are numbers gendered?"" Bogdan Kostic and Cory Derringer. 01 Dec 2014 10:37 17 Nov 2017, 22:27 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjA2>

MHRA Style

'Failure to replicate "are numbers gendered?"', Bogdan Kostic and Cory Derringer, , 01 December 2014 10:37 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjA2> [accessed 17 November 2017]

Chicago Style

"Failure to replicate "are numbers gendered?"", Bogdan Kostic and Cory Derringer, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjA2 (accessed November 17, 2017)

CBE/CSE Style

Failure to replicate "are numbers gendered?" [Internet]. Bogdan Kostic and Cory Derringer; 2014 Dec 01, 10:37 [cited 2017 Nov 17]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjA2

Reference to Original Report of Finding Wilkie, J.E.B., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2012). Are numbers gendered? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 206-210
Title Failure to replicate "are numbers gendered?"
If the original article contained multiple experiments, which one did you attempt to replicate? e.g., you might respond 'Study 1' or 'Experiment 4'. Experiment 3
Link to PDF of Original Report
Brief Statement of Original Result The original results reported that odd and even numbers are associated with masculinity and femininity, respectively. When pictures of babies were paired with odd or even “tracking” numbers, the babies paired with odd numbers were judged as more likely to be male, while the babies paired with even numbers were judged as more likely to be female.
Type of Replication Attempted Fairly Direct Replication
Result Type Failure to Replicate
Difference? Same Direction, .88
Number of Subjects 37
Number of Subjects in Original Study 36
Year in which Replication Attempt was Made 2014
Name of Investigators (Real Names Required) Bogdan Kostic and Cory Derringer
Detailed Description of Method/Results Participants were told that they would see a sample of baby photos that were drawn from a larger bin of photos. The task was to rate the likelihood that each baby was male. Ratings of 1 indicated it was not at all likely the baby was male, while ratings of 7 indicated it was extremely likely the baby was male. Participants viewed 16 baby photos, one at a time, in a PowerPoint presentation displayed at the front of the room. The stimuli were obtained from the original authors. Half the photos were presented alongside an odd number (composed of three odd digits), and half the photos were presented alongside an even number (composed of three even digits). Participants were told that these numbers were tracking numbers, and that they could be ignored. The pairing of each photo with an odd or even number was counterbalanced across two versions of the procedure. As participants viewed each photo they provided their ratings on a piece of paper, and when the procedure was over participants wrote on the backs of their papers how they made their ratings. No participant indicated referring to the tracking numbers in any way while making their ratings.

A paired-samples t-test showed that the average rating of photos paired with an odd tracking number (M = 4.22, SD = 0.43) is not significantly different than the average rating of photos paired with an even tracking number (M = 4.21, SD = 0.53), t(36) = 0.15, SE = 0.12, p = .88.
Any Known Methodological Differences
(between original and present study)?
The original study recruited participants from MTurk, and their procedure was presumably computer-based. Participants in the current replication attempt completed the activity in small groups of 4-10, and they viewed the stimuli on a projector at the front of the classroom while providing responses on a piece of paper.
Email of Investigator
Name of individuals who
actually carried out the project
Bogdan Kostic
Location of ProjectHill Hall 463, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO
Characteristics of Subjects
(subject pool, paid, etc.)
Other
Students in an Experimental Psychology (research methods) lab participated as part of a lab activity that was led by the instructor.
Where did these subjects reside?United States
Was this a Class Project?No
Further Details of Results as pdf
Additional Comments
Email of Original Investigator
Quantitive Information
I have complied with ethical standards for experimentation on human beings and, if necessary, have obtained appropriate permission from an Institutional Review Board or other oversight group.
TAG: Attention TAG: JDM TAG: Language TAG: Learning TAG: Memory TAG: Perception TAG: Performance TAG: Problem Solving TAG: Social Cognition TAG: Social Psychology TAG: Thinking

Are you posting an unpublished replication attempt that you conducted yourself, or noting a published replication attempt?

Post Unpublished
Post Published