Facilitation of Recall exact replication
How to Cite this Report
APA Style
Patrizio E. Tressoldi. Facilitation of Recall exact replication. (2012, August 19). Retrieved 20:03, May 23, 2013 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1MLA Style
"Facilitation of Recall exact replication" Patrizio E. Tressoldi. 19 Aug 2012 13:14 23 May 2013, 20:03 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1>MHRA Style
'Facilitation of Recall exact replication', Patrizio E. Tressoldi, , 19 August 2012 13:14 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1> [accessed 23 May 2013]Chicago Style
"Facilitation of Recall exact replication", Patrizio E. Tressoldi, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1 (accessed May 23, 2013)CBE/CSE Style
Facilitation of Recall exact replication [Internet]. Patrizio E. Tressoldi; 2012 Aug 19, 13:14 [cited 2013 May 23]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1| Reference to Original Report of Finding | Bem, D. (2011)Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and AffectJournal of Personality and Social Psychology,Vol. 100, No. 3, 407âÂÂ425 |
| Title | Facilitation of Recall exact replication |
| If the original article contained multiple experiments, which one did you attempt to replicate? e.g., you might respond 'Study 1' or 'Experiment 4'. | |
| Link to PDF of Original Report | View Article |
| Brief Statement of Original Result | Word priming presented after a congruent picture reduce the RTs for its recognition with respect to the incongruent pairs as it is typically observed in the classical priming protocol when the priming is presented before the pictures. |
| Type of Replication Attempted | Fairly Direct Replication |
| Result Type | Successful Replication |
| Difference? | Same Direction, 0.014 |
| Number of Subjects | 100 |
| Number of Subjects in Original Study | 50 |
| Year in which Replication Attempt was Made | 2012 |
| Name of Investigators (Real Names Required) | Patrizio E. Tressoldi |
| Detailed Description of Method/Results |
Results Mean â 95% CI SD Min - Max Practice 10.18 (9.5 to 10.7) 3.01 4 - 18 Control 9.47 (8.8 â 10.1) 3.17 1 - 17 Paired t test: Mean difference: 0.71; SD: 3.27; 95%CI: 0.08 â 1.38; t(99) = 2.23; p = 0.014 (one-tailed); effect size d = 0.22; r = 0.45 |
| Any Known Methodological Differences (between original and present study)? | The only difference with respect the original study, was the creation of word lists in Italian (not translation), but using the same criteria (e.g. category types, use frequency). We used the software made available by Bem (http://dbem.ws/psistuff). |
| Email of Investigator |
|
| Name of individuals who actually carried out the project | a research assistant |
| Location of Project | Lab facilities of Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Padova University-ITALY |
| Characteristics of Subjects (subject pool, paid, etc.) | University students from subject pool |
| Where did these subjects reside? | Unspecified |
| Was this a Class Project? | No |
| Further Details of Results as pdf | |
| Additional Comments | |
| Email of Original Investigator |
|
| Quantitive Information | |
| TAG: Attention TAG: JDM TAG: Language TAG: Learning TAG: Memory TAG: Perception TAG: Performance TAG: Problem Solving TAG: Social Cognition TAG: Social Psychology TAG: Thinking | |
