Independent Sampling of Features (#104)

Return to View Chart

How to Cite this Report

APA Style

Liqiang Huang. Independent Sampling of Features. (2011, November 29). Retrieved 16:15, August 17, 2017 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTA0

MLA Style

"Independent Sampling of Features" Liqiang Huang. 29 Nov 2011 20:55 17 Aug 2017, 16:15 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTA0>

MHRA Style

'Independent Sampling of Features', Liqiang Huang, , 29 November 2011 20:55 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTA0> [accessed 17 August 2017]

Chicago Style

"Independent Sampling of Features", Liqiang Huang, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTA0 (accessed August 17, 2017)

CBE/CSE Style

Independent Sampling of Features [Internet]. Liqiang Huang; 2011 Nov 29, 20:55 [cited 2017 Aug 17]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTA0

Reference to Original Report of Finding Vul, E., & Rich, A. N. (2010). Independent Sampling of Features Enables Conscious Perception of Bound Objects. Psychological Science, 21, 1168-1175.
Title Independent Sampling of Features
If the original article contained multiple experiments, which one did you attempt to replicate? e.g., you might respond 'Study 1' or 'Experiment 4'. Experiment 1
Link to PDF of Original ReportView Article
Brief Statement of Original Result The spatial errors of feature encoding are independent for the different dimensions
Type of Replication Attempted Fairly Exact Replication
Result Type Successful Replication
Difference? Not Applicable
Number of Subjects 20
Number of Subjects in Original Study
Year in which Replication Attempt was Made 2009
Name of Investigators (Real Names Required) Liqiang Huang
Detailed Description of Method/Results Observers tried to report the color/orientation of a cued item in an array. The spatial errors of the reports of color/orientations are independent of each other. In other words, even if the reported color was on the left of the actual color, the reported orientation was equally likely to be on the left and right sides of the actual orientation. This confirmed the original finding.
Any Known Methodological Differences
(between original and present study)?
The original study used color/identity whereas the present study used color/orientation. Also, the features were arranged in a more natural order in the present study (i.e., red->yellowish red-->reddish yellow-->yellow). These methodological differences made no difference to the results.
Email of Investigator
Name of individuals who
actually carried out the project
My RA ran subjects and I analyzed the data
Location of ProjectThe Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Characteristics of Subjects
(subject pool, paid, etc.)
University students paid for lab study
Where did these subjects reside?China
Was this a Class Project?No
Further Details of Results as pdf
Additional Comments
Email of Original Investigator
Quantitive Information
I have complied with ethical standards for experimentation on human beings and, if necessary, have obtained appropriate permission from an Institutional Review Board or other oversight group.
TAG: Attention TAG: JDM TAG: Language TAG: Learning TAG: Memory TAG: Perception TAG: Performance TAG: Problem Solving TAG: Social Cognition TAG: Social Psychology TAG: Thinking

Are you posting an unpublished replication attempt that you conducted yourself, or noting a published replication attempt?

Post Unpublished
Post Published