An Archive of Replication Attempts in Experimental Psychology

[What's New]
Show me postings from the past


Restrict to Specific Topics [Hide Options]
Toggle All Attention Behavior Genetics Development: Cognitive Development: Perception Development: Social JDM Language Learning Memory
Perception Performance Personality Problem Solving Psychometrics and IQ Psychopathology/Clinical Social Cognition Social Psychology Thinking
Include class projects


If you wish to submit details of your own replication attempt, you need to log in.

This Chart View provides an overview of each posting in the current group. To see the details of any one article, click on the View More Details of Posting link in the Title column.

Title Reference to Original Report of Finding Brief Statement of Original Result Type of Replication AttemptedResult TypeDifference? Number of SubjectsNumber of Subjects in Original Study Year in which Replication Attempt was MadeName of Investigators Tags How to Cite this Posting
Clipboard weight did not effect issue seriousness View More Details of Posting!Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169-1174. View Article Participants holding the heavier clipboard found it more important for the committee to listen to students' opinions regarding size of grants to study abroad than did participants given the light clipboard. Fairly Direct ReplicationFailure to Replicate No 60 51 2013Rebecca Hadley, Chloe Ring, Morrisa Gold and Kimberly DaubmanSocial Psychology View

APA Style

Rebecca Hadley, Chloe Ring, Morrisa Gold and Kimberly Daubman. Clipboard weight did not effect issue seriousness. (2013, February 23). Retrieved 09:44, July 22, 2017 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTUx

MLA Style

"Clipboard weight did not effect issue seriousness" Rebecca Hadley, Chloe Ring, Morrisa Gold and Kimberly Daubman. 23 Feb 2013 14:27 22 Jul 2017, 09:44 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTUx>

MHRA Style

'Clipboard weight did not effect issue seriousness', Rebecca Hadley, Chloe Ring, Morrisa Gold and Kimberly Daubman, , 23 February 2013 14:27 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTUx> [accessed 22 July 2017]

Chicago Style

"Clipboard weight did not effect issue seriousness", Rebecca Hadley, Chloe Ring, Morrisa Gold and Kimberly Daubman, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTUx (accessed July 22, 2017)

CBE/CSE Style

Clipboard weight did not effect issue seriousness [Internet]. Rebecca Hadley, Chloe Ring, Morrisa Gold and Kimberly Daubman; 2013 Feb 23, 14:27 [cited 2017 Jul 22]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTUx
Clipboard weight did not affect cogn. elaboration View More Details of Posting! View Discussion [1 comments]Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169-1174. View Article Participants who held a heavy clipboard showed more polarization between agreement with strong attitude items and disagreement with weak items compared to those holding a light clipboard. Fairly Direct ReplicationFailure to Replicate No 41 40 2007Nils JostmannSocial Psychology View

APA Style

Nils Jostmann. Clipboard weight did not affect cogn. elaboration. (2013, March 22). Retrieved 09:44, July 22, 2017 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU0

MLA Style

"Clipboard weight did not affect cogn. elaboration" Nils Jostmann. 22 Mar 2013 10:41 22 Jul 2017, 09:44 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU0>

MHRA Style

'Clipboard weight did not affect cogn. elaboration', Nils Jostmann, , 22 March 2013 10:41 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU0> [accessed 22 July 2017]

Chicago Style

"Clipboard weight did not affect cogn. elaboration", Nils Jostmann, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU0 (accessed July 22, 2017)

CBE/CSE Style

Clipboard weight did not affect cogn. elaboration [Internet]. Nils Jostmann; 2013 Mar 22, 10:41 [cited 2017 Jul 22]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU0
Weight did not affect value & importance judgments View More Details of Posting!Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169-1174.
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/20/9/1169.short
Participants holding a heavy cliboard made higher judgements of the monetary values of different currencies than participants holding a light clipboard; they also rated as more important that the university committee would listen to the opinion of the students. Finally, participants holding the heavy clipboard gave more polarised agreement ratings with strong vs. weak arguments concerning a subway under construction in the city. Highly Direct ReplicationFailure to Replicate Opposite Direction, .08; .09 31 40 2012Francesca Citron, Michael Kucharski, Adele GoldbergThinking View

APA Style

Francesca Citron, Michael Kucharski, Adele Goldberg. Weight did not affect value & importance judgments. (2014, June 13). Retrieved 09:44, July 22, 2017 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTkz

MLA Style

"Weight did not affect value & importance judgments" Francesca Citron, Michael Kucharski, Adele Goldberg. 13 Jun 2014 15:57 22 Jul 2017, 09:44 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTkz>

MHRA Style

'Weight did not affect value & importance judgments', Francesca Citron, Michael Kucharski, Adele Goldberg, , 13 June 2014 15:57 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTkz> [accessed 22 July 2017]

Chicago Style

"Weight did not affect value & importance judgments", Francesca Citron, Michael Kucharski, Adele Goldberg, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTkz (accessed July 22, 2017)

CBE/CSE Style

Weight did not affect value & importance judgments [Internet]. Francesca Citron, Michael Kucharski, Adele Goldberg; 2014 Jun 13, 15:57 [cited 2017 Jul 22]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTkz

Are you posting an unpublished replication attempt that you conducted yourself, or noting a published replication attempt?

Post Unpublished
Post Published